Court orders NPC to pay employees P6.49-Billion

by EVMail News on April 7, 2009


ORMOC CITY – A Quezon City regional trial court has awarded with finality this week some 9,777 employees of the National Power Corporation (NPC) a whooping P6.496-Billion representing “back allowances” and unpaid cost of living allowances (COLA) from November 1989 up to 1999, when the case was filed against the government corporation.

The sum, if equally divided among the 9,777 employees, would give each around P664,000.00. However, the distribution of the money would be prorated, depending on their salary scale, as the back allowances and COLA due to them represents 40 plus 10 percent of their salaries, respectively.

Presiding Judge Luisito G. Cortez of the RTC Branch 84 in Quezon City has also ordered NPC to pay the employees another P 704-million interest at 12 percent per annum on the whole sum, from the time the complaint was filed in December 2007 until its resolution in December 2008. The lawyers and “consultants” of the NPC employees were also awarded 300,000.00 in attorney’s fees, aside from five percent of the entire amount that each employee will receive, as consultancy fee for them. That would be around P324.8-million.
A notice to comply dated March 24, this year, has since been served by the sheriff of RTC Branch 84 to the NPC on March 25, after the decision became final. It is not learned at this point in time if the NPC would file an appeal on the judge’s decision at the Supreme Court, or if still can be appealed.
However, NPC employees are confident they would get the P6.496-Billion award, banking on a similar case that has already been resolved by the Supreme Court just last December 2008. This was the complaint filed by terminated members of the NPC Drivers and Mechanics Association (NPC DAMA). The Supreme Court has ordered NPC to pay the terminated drivers their back wages and allowances, saying their termination from work was illegal. The National Power Corporation is a government-controlled corporation. Its transmission facilities under TransCo have since been privatized, including the one in Eastern Visayas based at Milagro, this city, which was bought by a Chinese firm and now operating under the name National Grid Corporation of the Philippines (NGCP).

NPC is the same entity that has recently been allowed by the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) to increase on their power rates by some P1.1460 in the Visayas, claiming they have been operating on the red. However, in a certification issued on April 22, 2008, Alexander Japon, NPC senior finance department manager, certified that it has available funds for the payment of back allowances and COLA to its personnel and former employees in the amount of P8.5-Billion.
To demand for the immediate compliance of the court order, former NPC employees, majority of who have since been absorbed by the new owners of its facilities, have started a “peaceful assembly” in their respective locations every lunch break. Here in Milagro, this city, the employees took to assembling at the plant gates during their lunch break starting Friday, March 27, 2009. Requesting anonymity, some employees told the EV Mail that what they are doing is just to dramatize their demand, but they are doing it during their lunch break so as not to disrupt the normal operations of the electric transmission facility.

Class suit

The complaint against the NPC is for mandamus. It was filed by two employees originally, Abner P. Eleria and Melito B. Lupanco. Eleria was president of the NPC Employees Consolidated Union or NECU and Lupanggo, president of the NPC Employees and Workers Union (NEWU). Soon thereafter, their respective unions filed as petitioner-intervenors in behalf of its members. The judge then ruled that since the parties involved were numerous, that the same was a “class suit”. The petitioners complained to the court that before November 1989, they received allowances and COLA which were discontinued after the Salary Standardization Law took effect. The Department of Budget and Management, on the other hand, issued DBM Corporate Circular No. 10 (CCC No. 10), as its implementing guidelines. The guidelines, however, proved fatally defective after it was not published. It was only published by the DBM on the Official Gazette on March 1999, after 10 years. Government counsels, on the other hand, including the Office of the Solicitor General, tried to argue for NPC and DBM, attacking the complaint for various technicalities including the non-payment of the proper amount of docket fees.

However, Judge Cortez brushed these aside, invoking in his decision the constitutional right of the people to the equal protection of law. In his prefatory statement, the judge said “The State affirms labor as a primary social economic force. It shall protect the rights of workers and promote their welfare. The state values the dignity of every human person and guarantees full respect of human rights.” He also invoked that “Free access to the courts and quasi-judicial bodies and adequate legal assistance shall not be denied to any person by reason of poverty”. He said that when the case was filed at his sala, the Clerk of Court computed the proper fees for its filing then, since it was only in the course of the proceedings that it became a “class suit”. As such, the judge also imposed a lien of P145.4-million on the total award representing payment of the adjusted docket fees. He cited Section 2, Rule 141 of the Rules of Court that provides: “Where the court in its final judgment awards a claim not alleged, or a relief different from, or more than that claimed in the pleading, the party concerned shall pay the additional fees which shall constitute lien on the judgment in satisfaction of said lien”. with a report from JP Serseña


{ 3287 comments… read them below or add one }

mar-uo July 19, 2015 at 1:51 am

Amor, para sa iyong kaliwanagan wala pang katiyakan sa dama at cola. paki sabi sa ama mo wag munang umasa baka ma stress lang sa kakahintay kasi hindi pa naglalabas ng final decisio9n ang SC. sa aking personal na opinion at base sa mga nakakalap kong balita eh malabo pang mabayaran ang inyong pinaka hihintay. wag munang umasa at parang matatagalan pa. yun lang

Reply

amor July 19, 2015 at 5:30 am

mr. mar-uo, marami pong salamat sa inyong paliwanag…pasensya na po sa aking abala..salamat po muli…God Bless po…..amor

Reply

Lason July 19, 2015 at 8:36 am

Bbyran p o hndi na?

Reply

lason July 20, 2015 at 7:04 am

wag n po kayo umasa kasi hndi n babayaran tayo move on na tayo

Reply

Michael July 20, 2015 at 7:46 am

Natapus din

Reply

John July 20, 2015 at 5:05 pm

patience lang, babayaran din tayo

Reply

elizasuelto July 20, 2015 at 6:02 pm

thank you Lord, we will wait in Your time.

Reply

lason July 21, 2015 at 3:53 am

tapos n po

Reply

John July 21, 2015 at 4:41 am

saan po yung link na nakasabi na panalo ang NPC?

Reply

John July 21, 2015 at 4:47 am

wag po kayo maniwala sa lason na to guys
wala pa po akong nakikitang decision sa Supreme Court sa website nila

Reply

Randy July 25, 2015 at 11:41 am

@John. Sa SC website, click “Decision”, then click the month of “June 2014″, then look for the SC decision dated June 30, 2014 of NPC-DAMA(maraming decisions dyan San month of June, just scroll down). Pls acknowledge Kung makita at mabasa mo.

Reply

amor July 25, 2015 at 9:51 pm

mr randy for info po di po mabasa ang laman ng sinasabi nyo na June 30, 2014 npc-dama case..nag e-error po…..

Reply

Randy July 25, 2015 at 11:12 pm

Just wait for a few minutes to download it, 54 pages kaya Medyo matagal, then scroll down more and more scroll down. I just seen the decision now. Try to do it again as instructed step by step. Hope u can read it now.

Reply

amor July 25, 2015 at 10:21 pm

mr randy kung nabasa po nyo ano po ang sinsabi….para naman po masabi ko sa aking ama…salamat po …..amor (anak po ako ng dating taga npc)…pasensya na po at nagtatanong lang po kasi di na po makagamit ng computer ang aking ama…

Reply

Randy July 25, 2015 at 11:14 pm

Panalo na tayo sa kaso, last year pa, June 30 to be exact. Kaya Lang nagkaroon ng TRO dahil sabi ng NPC ay Mali daw ang computation. Wait Lang tayo.

Reply

John July 21, 2015 at 4:41 am

yang lason si randy ata yan guys

Reply

blita po? July 21, 2015 at 11:38 am

blita po?

Reply

John July 21, 2015 at 4:43 pm

wala pa atang decision yung SC sa case na to
tiningnan ko sa site ng supreme court

Reply

leoncio rocamora July 23, 2015 at 2:06 am

may balita na po ba sa DAMA at COLA?

Reply

ka berto July 23, 2015 at 3:25 am

ay naku. bat dika muna mag basa ng naka post sa arapan mo. sabi na nga wala pa eh. tas nag tatanong ka ng balita sa dama at cola. gamitin mu nga common sense mo. ayan oh wala ……

Reply

John July 23, 2015 at 5:52 am

wala pa pong decision ang supreme court. wala pang nakalagay na decision sa supreme court website about sa DAMA

Reply

blita po? July 23, 2015 at 5:53 am

anu na

Reply

John July 23, 2015 at 8:35 am
Randy July 25, 2015 at 12:02 pm

Pls read my reply above re-SC decision on dama

Reply

John July 23, 2015 at 8:36 am

wala pa pong decision about sa DAMA

Reply

ka berto July 24, 2015 at 6:08 am

SUNTUKAN NALANG!

Reply

junjun July 24, 2015 at 9:49 am

@ka berto > ayaw ko ng suntukan , ang gusto ko ay kurutan na lang sa SINGIT hanggang sa magdugo !!! ang unang mag – DUGO ang SINGIT ay siyang TALOOOO!!!

Reply

denrkz July 25, 2015 at 6:21 am

@ka berto, cool ka lang, maraming ganyan dito, makulit! masanay ka kung hindi ikaw din ang talo!

Reply

Inc July 25, 2015 at 7:33 am

Wla ng bayaran mggnap

Reply

John July 25, 2015 at 9:16 am

bat wala pang nakalagay sa SC Decisions sa page nila?
saan nyo po yan nakuha na source? gagawa ako ng article about dyan

Reply

Randy July 25, 2015 at 12:00 pm

@John, pls read my comment above re-SC decision on dama

Reply

John July 25, 2015 at 5:22 pm

pero sa 2014 pa yun?

Reply

amor July 25, 2015 at 10:23 pm

mr randy for info po di po mabasa ang laman ng sinasabi nyo na June 30, 2014 npc-dama case..nag e-error po…..

mr randy kung nabasa po nyo ano po ang sinsabi….para naman po masabi ko sa aking ama…salamat po …..amor (anak po ako ng dating taga npc)…pasensya na po at nagtatanong lang po kasi di na po makagamit ng computer ang aking ama…

Reply

Michael July 26, 2015 at 9:00 am

Sana matapus na po ito.

Reply

Ryan July 27, 2015 at 8:34 am

may update na po ba?

Reply

blita po? July 27, 2015 at 10:14 am

wala n

Reply

Napocor July 27, 2015 at 3:07 pm

Sa aking palagay, dinedelay ng SC ang paglabas ng resolution hanggang umabot na ng Eleksyon Ban pero pabor pa rin sa mga dama claimants ang bagong resolution. Sapagkat ang PNoy admin gumawa ng hakbang para madelay ito sapagkat ayaw talagang bayaran ang Dama.

Reply

Napocor July 27, 2015 at 3:21 pm

Wait and pray po tayo. Hwag nating isipin masyado magdudulot Lang po ng stress sa atin. Salamat!

Reply

kulafu damasu July 28, 2015 at 12:13 am

lalong lalaki ang babayaran ng NPC pag nadelay pa ito ng husto.

Reply

Ryan July 28, 2015 at 1:27 am

tama ka, lalaki na naman to tapos mag dedelay na namn yan sila hanggang manalo -_-

Reply

Randy July 28, 2015 at 7:41 pm
Ryan August 3, 2015 at 6:18 pm

so hanggang ngayon, wala pang decision kung babayaran ba tayo o hindi?

Reply

blita po? August 3, 2015 at 10:08 am

anu ibg sbhin nto

Reply

Inc August 3, 2015 at 10:44 pm

Asa pa

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: